you need to reduce power consumption of the A2/A1 when not used

I own the A1 version and was expecting improvements on the A2 version regarding standby power consumption:

if you do the following test, you'll see that the A2 or A1 consumes too much power when it's on its base.
once the battery is charged, it doesn't go into a deep standby mode. to check this, just do the following test: disconnect the 220 V power supply, and you'll see that after a day the A2 or A1 battery is completely discharged a 0 %  (it's a 3 Ah battery though).

the only way to put the Dream into deep sleep mode is to switch it off manually (as you do when you want to clean it).  
This is not at all practical, and the robot would have to be in deep sleep mode: it would be great if the Dream enginneer could only keep activate Bluetooth (which consumes almost nothing, even when in “advertising” mode, for those in the know);  
it's enough to let the user choose a sleep mode that allows the robot to be woken up via Bluetooth, and less interestingly, via WiFi for those who want to use the Dream when they're not at home.
So I'am waiting for a new update version of the firmware of the A1/A1Pro/A2 to optimise power consumption when the robot remain on his parking station...


#SmartMowingMaster Challenge

Dear CZ295372,

Hello!
Thank you very much for choosing Dreame and giving us your valuable suggestions！
We will actively feedback your opinions to the product R&D department. We will continue to improve and upgrade our products based on the opinions of every customer.

I noticed the same consumption, when the robot is at its base it does not go into deep sleep.I hope you will bring us an update soon.

Hi,
Same here.
Is it possible the robot is always pushing into the station, to make sure the electrical contacts are operating ?
I can hear a low frequency noise when it is on the station, like if it was slightly making its wheels go ahead in order to keep contact with the station.
As for a temporary installation, my station has a tiny angle which goes towards the back off the station. This made the robot naturally going a little back after getting electrical contact with its station on the first tests. But now it stucks correctly to the station (but I think this is at the cost of some power consumption to keep it stuck permanently).
Am I right ? Will the power consumption be drown to 0 when I will rearrange the setup and make the station perfectly leveled on the ground ?
Thanks in advance for your reply.
Olivier (FR)

When the robot is on its station, it consumes about 4.5 w/h.